Monthly Archives: January 2013
Totally worth your 12 minutes. What ARE we preparing our kids for?
Students are the future, but what’s the future for students?
To arm them with the relevant, timeless skills for our rapidly changing world, we need to revolutionize what it means to learn. Education innovators like Dr. Sugata Mitra, visiting professor at MIT; Sal Khan, founder of Khan Academy; and Dr. Catherine Lucey, Vice Dean of Education at UCSF, are redefining how we engage young minds for a creatively and technologically-advanced future. Which of these eduvators holds the key for unlocking the learning potential inside every student?
Rules of Engagement
Zachary came home from school the other day feeling pretty pleased with himself. He had a “quiz” in chemistry (his most challenging subject that he struggles with) and reported that it was awesome.
Yes, you are right on if you are picturing me standing in amazement with my mouth hanging open.
Zachary is an 11th grader in public school. To know Zach is to see him always fixing, researching or tinkering with something be it the ski ramp in the backyard, the latest gadgets in photography or longboarding or his guitar. He is and always has been “in motion”. I used to joke that he came out of the womb on wheels! I believe he is a very different person when in school.
He went on to tell me that this was a quiz where you “did” things and so he felt like he was better able to perform. In his own words, “I am not good at memorizing, I am good at applying things.”
He explained how they had 5 different elements that they had to weigh and then do calculations in relationship to what it was they had discovered. After each element they were to go up to the teacher and check in. He was animated as he continued his story explaining that because he does not have a calculator he usually just borrows one from his math teacher, but because this was a pop quiz he did not have the time to go and get one. So he decided he would do the math on his own.
Upon completing the first few problems he checked in with his teacher to discover he got them all right!! When his teacher asked him how he did these problems Zach instructed him to turn the paper over where he found a lattice method scratched out on the back of his paper.
The teacher, according to Zachary, was amazed that he was able to do this math without a calculator. Delighted he went back to finish the last 2 problems, but alas, he ran out of time. He reported that he got a 70 on it, but that he was thrilled because as he stated, “I feel like it is the first time that I actually understood something in chemistry.”
“What would happen, if, rather than focusing on teaching reading strategies, we focused instead on getting students engaged?” Peter Johnston
This quote by Peter Johnston has had me thinking all week about the idea of engagement. He refers to engagement in terms of reading and actually asks some hard questions about instruction in this Stenhouse blog post. Worth the read.
So, the next question is what if we decided to make that same commitment across all subject areas, curriculums and grade levels? What if the most common core standard of all that we were to work towards was engagement of ALL of our students? What if we focused primarily on engaging our students and worked towards 100% proficiency of engagement?
This is so simple. There I said it! Think about it. We can go on teaching and standing in front of the room and sharing our knowledge. We can go on creating meaningless tests to supposedly “show” the growth of our students. We can continue to spend millions and billions of dollars on the next magical cure that won’t work or…imagine this…we could look at our students and focus on engagement. WHAT matters in our work if our students are not engaged? What will they learn without engagement?
What happened in this chemistry class? The class where Zach admits to getting his daily naps because he has so much trouble paying attention. He argues that nobody really understands what It going on. So what turned this day into a class period filled with engagement and dare I use the term, rigor? I believe it all started with the ability to move and use his body. He was not sitting in a seat in the back of the room watching the minutes slowly tick by. He was standing, walking and using his hands to “apply” what he did and did not know. He was then able to get some immediate feedback on his work and then a little gravy in the name of praise for his ability to perform without a calculator. This real feedback sent him back confident and hungry for more. It was only the clock that worked against him as he told me that he knows he could have gotten the other two if he had had the time. And even if he didn’t get them right he was ENGAGED!!
If I were his teacher I would look at Zachary differently than those who used their calculators and adjust his grade accordingly. IF the goal is engagement and ultimately understanding could it not be argued that perhaps he understood more deeply because he could perform without the calculator? Shouldn’t he be graded on what he did know and not that the time ran out? But I also realize that I am far from the norm and that grading is another topic for another post.
It’s like my cats, you know. They are very finicky about their food. It is clear when they do not like a particular kind of food because they don’t eat it! They are not engaged in their eating. So I don’t continue to give them the same food because I have deemed it is the best food for them, I try out different kinds of food to see what works for them to engage them in their eating.
Why do we continue to do things we know don’t work…especially when so many of us have the vast variety of theory and knowledge that DOES work and even more importantly that engagement is something our students are starving for?
Opt Out of Testing: Do We Dare to Bubble Dot That?
Well, the time has come for me to unleash the beast inside and ask you to look at, for yourself, your kids and your community the idea of opting out of High Stakes Testing. Up until last week I have steered clear of writing about The Common Core State Standards and the test that will follow and how I have seen the rise of testing in our schools over the past 11 years (thank you No Child Left Behind) has actually undermined and even damaged the education students are receiving by attempting to create a “one size fits all” mentality and leaving systems, professionals and teachers feeling they “MUST” teach to the test. Period.
Recently Frontline asked three educational reform leaders including Diane Ravitch, Margaret Spellings and Geoffrey Canada to watch and then speak back to The Education of Michelle Rhee, former chancellor of the DC public schools and a highly controversial figure in educational reform.
Margaret Spellings, former US Secretary of Education under George W. Bush and one of the architects of No Child Left Behind writes in response to Rhee’s work and the upcoming onslaught of the Common Core,
“But I still argue that NCLB’s ambition remains pretty modest – all children performing at grade level in reading and mathematics – the bare minimum any of us would want for our own children or grandchildren. And while having every student meet the new Common Core standards is a laudable goal for DCPS and all the states now pursuing “college and career readiness,” it is an empty promise if they’ve yet to meet NCLB’s more modest goals.”
And I shudder to think that if a proponent of No Child Left Behind believes that even those goals were moderate then perhaps what lies ahead may be more daunting that we even realize.
The question is do we dare? Do we dare go against the norm or is the fear of change and going against the norm too much to risk? Do we fear that by taking our own kids out of the testing world that it will somehow put them in a place of less importance than those who do test? Will it limit their options in terms of lifelong goals, colleges and careers? Without “measuring” our kids and putting them into little boxes will they become less significant in this world? Without their numbers pasted on their backs will they matter as much as those with numbers or even more importantly those with the highest numbers?
What does it mean to opt out? Opting out is defined by United Opt Out National, in three phases, the first of which is to change the public narrative that testing is good. These are the questions I am attempting to raise here. The second is to break the cycle of complicity, isolation, coercion and the third is to support alternatives through knowledge, collaboration and trust in the power of collaboration. I do believe that if we come together we can make a difference. For more details about opting out…
Check out this site that talks about what it means to opt out and how we can band together to do so. http://unitedoptout.com/flyers/what-does-it-mean-to-opt-out-2/
Or watch this video by Peggy Robertson, one of the founders of opt out, http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_bJlbkxnDVU where she and her two boys reach out to Diane Ravitch,historian of education at New York University and expert on school reform to join them in the national opt out campaign in DC this coming April 4 – 7 where we will unite to protest against testing. I am considering making this journey and would love to have others I know come with me or meet me there!! You interested? Here are more details.
http://unitedoptout.com/update-for-occupy-doe-2-0-the-battle-for-public-schools/
So it is time for action. Enough kavetching about it…it is time for action and trusting in the process of collaboration and the idea that if we band together we can make change happen. REAL change for all of our kids.
What do you think?
Do we dare?
The Not So Common Core Standards: Potential Implications and Meaning For Us All
We live in a country that was founded on differences. As I write this, I recall images of Felix Baumgartner free falling out of a hot air balloon from space. We value this ingenuity, this creativity, this originality, this risk-taking. We live in the land of the free and yet everywhere you look, particularly in public education, it would seem we have collectively handed over our freedom in the name of compliance, consistency and the oh so not “common”, known as The Common Core.
The powerful noblemen have doled out their marching orders to us, the commoners and we had better comply or beware. David Coleman and Susan Pimenthal, co-authors of the Common Core Standards, are not educators. They have not spent time in classrooms on the front lines and yet they have determined the core, the central, innermost, or most essential part of education. So the question is…what does this mean for the public education of our students, your kids, my kids and those of the future?
The Common Core Standards document initially reads as somewhat benign. Who would argue the idea that there “should” be a core of standards that all students in this great nation strive for? (Although I tend to avoid “shoulding”on myself at all costs) How could one oppose standards, ensuring success for all students? (I mean if over 40 states adopted this then it must be great.) Who would dare even oppose such a notion? (And if you do oppose then what is wrong with you to be such a “curmudgeon” or a “whiner”.) At the risk of being both I will go on.
Read this kindergarten standard keeping in mind many 5 year olds show up to school and they do not even know their letters and they are beginning to lose their baby teeth. For some they have never even attended preschool and this is their first school experience. They are filled with wonder, curiosity, creativity and a natural desire to learn.
CCSS.ELA-Literacy.W.K.1 Use a combination of drawing, dictating, and writing to compose opinion pieces in which they tell a reader the topic or the name of the book they are writing about and state an opinion or preference about the topic or book (e.g., My favorite book is…).
I would argue that this is a more realistic standard for our 1st or 2nd graders. Do we want our students to succeed or do we want to set standards that are so out of their range of normal development that they fail even before they begin?
And while I realize there ARE 5 year olds all over the nation who are more than capable of performing this standard, there are just as many who are not. There is nothing magical about being 5 that means you are as developed as the other 5 year olds sitting next to you, not to mention that our boys are typically at least 6 months behind our girls. And if this standard was something to look at in terms of a goal to work towards, I would have no problem with it, but it will not. It will be seen as what is expected as “common” for all students. We are starting out leaving over half of our kids behind.
There is no such thing as kindergarten anymore with these standards. Sorry kids, no time to learn your letters, learn through play and be 5 years old as the standards expect you to show up to school reading informational texts closely and writing persuasive essays already. Put away the sand tables and the blocks and the dramatic play areas there is work to be done. And this begs the question, why are we so concerned with the academic side of the child without including the social and emotional sides? They all work in connection with each other and without each given it’s due the scales are tipped toward disaster.
The Common Core standards alone are not bad. In fact, in my work with schools there are great conversations that are happening as a result of this document as it asks us to look at where we are and what we are doing and what areas we need to improve on. This is all good reflective practice and if it started and ended there…we would be able to say to ourselves, “This too shall pass”. But will it? Never before in public education has there been such a broad sweeping, nationally accepted document. And while states all over the nation are adopting this document, two groups are being paid millions of dollars to come up with the best assessments (See PARCC (http://www.parcconline.org/achieving-common-core) and Smarter Balanced at (http://www.smarterbalanced.org/)).
And therein lies the rub. The high stakes testing piece to this latest “one size fits all” movement will come out in the year 2014 and I am predicting that at this point everything will change. Schools all over the nation will be failing these tests and large publishing companies will be at their doors with the next magic bullet that will “solve” all testing deficiencies. Have we learned nothing from No Child Left Behind? The idea of “teaching to the test” will take on more power and energy than ever.
This is not about good education. This is not about educating our kids. This is about making money and in order for that to happen we must first create an enormous problem. Failure is the best reason for anyone to buy anything! Overweight? Buy this pill or that diet. Failing schools? Don’t leave it up the professionals within the schools to figure out what they need, because publishers know so much more. Students? Who are they?
We need to return to conversations about our students and what is or is not developmentally appropriate, what our students need for instruction in the moment based on their thinking, their questions and how they see the world. Would you ever take an infant and force them to “walk” down the stairs? NO! But physical development is something concrete. Cognitive development, on the other hand, is harder to understand and yet we forge ahead with the idea that if we place unrealistic expectations on our students then they will just rise.
They will not rise unless they are ready to rise!! Those who are not ready will fall and hurdle to the bottom of the stairs with nobody with be there to pick them up as there is a test to teach to and quite frankly, “I don’t give a sh!t what you think or feel.” This is a quote from David Coleman, one of 2 co-authors of the Common Core. He has also taken on the position as head of The College Board 2 months ago. This organization has more power over the future of all of our students and now this man will also align the SAT’s and test preps with ‘HIS” common core. There is even talk of test scores being attached to kids GPA’s. Can you say conflict of interest?
Why and how, I must ask, have we allowed one elitist man from Harvard to have so much power over our entire system? A man, who only cares about what he thinks. Watch him as he demonstrates his version of a close reading on YouTube (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aTCiQVCpdQc) with A Letter From Birmingham Jail. Or don’t, unless you really need a nap! THIS is the future model for good teaching? He is completely in his own head and unaware of his audience. This demonstration both scares and depresses me.
And yet, why is it that those of us in education are the first ones to jump on to any wagon that happens to be going by, regardless of what band is playing? Where has our responsibility to question gone? Why are we not asking about what band is playing? Why are we blindly following the pack? Let’s question what is happening here before it is too late. Let’s take a risk, jump out of that balloon and take the plunge toward thinking and questioning what this means for our kids, our teachers and the future of our entire public educational system.
PS In my next post I will discuss some ways we can become actively involved as I discuss opting out of testing and events we can attend to show our support.
















